Any two boxes, one scale
Container Comparison
Pick any two containers from the fleet — the seven dry sizes or the special types — and see their specifications side by side, with both silhouettes drawn to a single scale so the difference is visible, not just numeric. Rows where the two boxes differ are highlighted.
| 20 ft container | 40 ft high cube container | |
|---|---|---|
| External length | 6.058 m | 12.192 m |
| External width | 2.438 m | 2.438 m |
| External height | 2.591 m | 2.896 m |
| Internal length | 5.898 m | 12.032 m |
| Internal width | 2.352 m | 2.352 m |
| Internal height | 2.393 m | 2.698 m |
| Tare weight | 2,230 kg | 3,900 kg |
| Max gross | 30,480 kg | 32,500 kg |
| Payload | 28,250 kg | 28,600 kg |
| Volume | 33.2 m³ | 76.4 m³ |
| EUR pallets | 11 | 25 |
| TEU | 1 | 2 |
How to use the comparator
The two selectors cover the whole fleet: 10, 20, 40, 45, 48 and 53 ft dry boxes, the high cubes, and the special types — reefer, open top, flat rack, tank and double door. For each pair the tool lists external and internal dimensions, tare, max gross, payload, cubic capacity, EUR pallet count and TEU value, and draws both boxes to one scale — the fastest way to grasp that a 45 ft high cube is not “a bit bigger” than a 20 ft but seven metres longer and a foot taller.
Read the highlighted rows first: identical values render plain, differences get a background. Comparing a 40 ft standard with a 40 ft high cube, for instance, lights up exactly three rows — external height, internal height, volume — which is the entire difference between the two most common containers on earth. The classic pairings have full written verdicts too: 20 ft vs 40 ft (weight carrier vs volume carrier) and high cube vs standard (what the extra foot buys).
Every size in one master table
Two containers at a time answers one question; the table below answers all of them at once — every ISO and domestic size with ISO code, external and internal dimensions, capacity, payload and pallet count in one place. Most spec pages on the web cover one size per page and metric or imperial, never both; between this table (metres) and the companion below it (feet), every number exists in both unit systems on a single URL.
| Specification | ISO | External dimensions, m | Internal dimensions, m | m³ | Max payload, kg | EUR pallets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 ft container | 10G1 | 2.99 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 2.83 × 2.35 × 2.39 | 15.9 | 8,860 | 4 |
| 20 ft container | 22G1 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 5.90 × 2.35 × 2.39 | 33.2 | 28,250 | 11 |
| 40 ft container | 42G1 | 12.19 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 12.03 × 2.35 × 2.39 | 67.7 | 26,740 | 25 |
| 40 ft high cube container | 45G1 | 12.19 × 2.44 × 2.90 | 12.03 × 2.35 × 2.70 | 76.4 | 28,600 | 25 |
| 45 ft high cube container | L5G1 | 13.72 × 2.44 × 2.90 | 13.56 × 2.35 × 2.70 | 86.0 | 27,700 | 27 |
| 48 ft container | — | 14.63 × 2.59 × 2.90 | 14.45 × 2.50 × 2.70 | 97.5 | 26,170 | 30 |
| 53 ft container | — | 16.15 × 2.59 × 2.90 | 16.00 × 2.50 × 2.70 | 108.0 | 25,580 | 33 |
| 20 ft reefer | 22R1 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 5.44 × 2.29 × 2.28 | 28.3 | 27,400 | 10 |
| 40 ft high cube reefer | 45R1 | 12.19 × 2.44 × 2.90 | 11.58 × 2.29 × 2.55 | 67.3 | 29,520 | 23 |
| 20 ft open top | 22U1 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 5.90 × 2.35 × 2.35 | 32.5 | 28,130 | 11 |
| 40 ft open top | 42U1 | 12.19 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 12.03 × 2.35 × 2.35 | 66.4 | 28,650 | 25 |
| 20 ft flat rack | 22P1 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 5.94 × 2.35 × 2.35 | — | 31,260 | — |
| 40 ft flat rack | 42P1 | 12.19 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 12.06 × 2.37 × 1.96 | — | 39,520 | — |
| 20 ft tank container | 22T1 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 6.06 × 2.44 × 2.59 | 25.0 | 32,100 | — |
Data: ISO 668:2020
The same fleet in imperial units
| Container | External (ft) | Height | Capacity (ft³) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 ft | 9′10″ × 8′ | 8′6″ | 561 |
| 20 ft | 19′10.5″ × 8′ | 8′6″ | 1,172 |
| 40 ft | 40′ × 8′ | 8′6″ | 2,390 |
| 40 ft high cube | 40′ × 8′ | 9′6″ | 2,700 |
| 45 ft high cube | 45′ × 8′ | 9′6″ | 3,037 |
| 48 ft | 48′ × 8′6″ | 9′6″ | 3,443 |
| 53 ft | 53′ × 8′6″ | 9′6″ | 3,814 |
Full unit-by-unit tables live on the dimensions in feet and dimensions in meters pages; the printable all-sizes reference is the master chart.
Pallets and CBM per size
For load planning, two numbers matter more than any dimension: cubic metres and pallet positions. Here they are for the whole range, floor-loaded single tier.
| Container | CBM (m³) | EUR pallets | US 48×40 pallets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 ft | 15.9 | 4 | 2 |
| 20 ft | 33.2 | 11 | 10 |
| 40 ft | 67.7 | 25 | 21 |
| 40 ft high cube | 76.4 | 25 | 21 |
| 45 ft high cube | 86.0 | 27 | 24 |
| 48 ft | 97.5 | 30 | 26 |
| 53 ft | 108.0 | 33 | 30 |
Note the high cube row: one extra foot of height adds 8.7 m³ but zero pallet positions — the gain is stacking height, not floor. To fit your own carton or pallet size, run the CBM calculator and the pallet calculator.
Cost per cubic metre: the comparison that decides purchases
When the comparator is being used to decide what to buy, divide price by volume. A used cargo-worthy 20 ft runs $1,200–2,500 for 33.2 m³ — $36–75 per cubic metre. A used 40 ft (standard or high cube) runs $1,500–3,500 for 67.7–76.4 m³ — $22–52 per cubic metre. The 40 ft wins on volume economics every time: forties are plentiful at import-heavy ports, so doubling the steel costs nowhere near double the money.
The 20 ft still earns its price when the constraint is something other than volume: a tighter site (6 m vs 12 m of level ground), a payload-bound load (28,250 kg vs 26,740 kg), or resale liquidity — twenties move faster in the second-hand market. Current market ranges by size and grade, updated regularly, are in the container prices guide.
When specialty types change the math
The comparisons above assume dry boxes; the special types bend every rule of thumb. A reefer gives up volume to insulation — 28.3 m³ in a 20 ft against 33.2 dry — and its working machinery makes even a retired unit cost 2–3× a dry box. A flat rack inverts the payload table: a 40 ft rack is rated to ~40 t of cargo, half again more than any dry container. An open top matches dry-box volume but trades its roof stack rating for crane access, and a tank measures in litres (21,000–26,000) rather than cubic metres. Compare any of them against a standard box in the tool above — the silhouettes make the geometry obvious.
Frequently asked questions
Which container size is the most cost-effective?
Per cubic metre of space, the used 40 ft: $1,500–3,500 for 67.7–76.4 m³ works out to $22–52/m³, against $36–75/m³ for a used 20 ft. The 20 ft only wins when the constraint is site space, payload weight or resale liquidity rather than volume.
Is a 40 ft container double a 20 ft?
In volume, yes — 67.7 vs 33.2 m³, since only the length doubles. In payload, no: both share ~30,480 kg max gross, and the heavier 40 ft box actually carries slightly less cargo weight (26,740 vs 28,250 kg).
What specifications matter most when comparing containers?
For shipping: internal dimensions, cubic capacity, payload and pallet count. For buying: external footprint (does it fit the site), door opening, and price per cubic metre. External length and height decide transport and permits; everything else is derived from those.
Is a high cube worth it over a standard 40 ft?
Usually — the extra foot of height adds 8.7 m³ (67.7 → 76.4 m³) for a typically small premium, and for conversions the 2.698 m internal height survives insulation and flooring. It adds no pallet positions, so purely floor-loaded freight gains nothing.
What are the smallest and largest ISO containers?
Smallest in common service: the 10 ft (15.9 m³) — with military Tricon/Quadcon units splitting a 20 ft slot even finer. Largest ISO unit: the 45 ft high cube (86 m³). The 48 ft and 53 ft (97.5 and 108 m³) are North American domestic sizes outside the ISO deep-sea system.
Where do the numbers in this tool come from?
From ISO 668 ratings and published carrier and lessor spec sheets — the same dataset behind every size page on this site. Individual units vary slightly by manufacturer (tare especially); the doors of the actual box, and its CSC plate, are always the final authority.